The most corrupt Judge in America is at it again — insider dealing, corruption, bias, fraud, and perjury… Simply put – you cannot win a case in the Courtroom of Judge Sheri Bluebond unless the lawyers are her local attorney friends, confidants, and those who she hopes will send “letters of recommendation” for her Reappointment to the Bench (since no one would ever elect or properly Appoint Judge Sheri Bluebond). And instead of fulfilling her Judicial and Ethical Duty to Recuse and Disqualify heself (with or without Motion), Bluebond prefers corruption. And now, in October 2022, Judge Bluebond fights disqualification and recusal again…
Case after multi-million dollar case before Judge Sheri Bluebond – it happens. Bizarre, one-sided, unprecedented, and unfounded rulings showing a complete bias by Judge Sheri Bluebond for one party…But why? Judge Sheri Bluebond knows “Rulings = Recommendations” and the more she rules for her local (loser) Bankruptcy friends…the greater likelihood she remains a Judge (since Bankruptcy Judges aren’t elected or governor appointed)…
Imagine a Judge who thinks that while a multi-million dollar case is ongoing in her Courtroom, it is ethical and proper to have constant and ongoing ‘secret’ interaction with one party’s litigants in the case? Well, Judge Sheri Bluebond does…Judge Sheri Bluebond is at it again — insider dealing, corruption, favoritism, bias — all towards Litigants in her Courtroom who are her buddies, friends, and of course, those who she hopes will write letters recommending her to the Bench….Why does Judge Sheri Bluebond continue to “actively conceal” these outside interactions with lawyers on one side? Clearly, because Judge Sheri Bluebond is the most corrupt Judge in America….And no one knows this corruption better than me. And now Mark Slotkin – who in October 2022 took the proper steps to “disqualify” Judge Sheri Bluebond for bias (Motion below).
Here is just a portion of documents related to Judge Bluebond’s corruption and fraud…
Did she Disqualify as required? Of course not! In Re Slotkin (Case Number 2:20-bk-12042 and Adversary Case Number 2:20-ap-01672), Undisclosed and concealed meetings, communications and panels with opposing Counsel (whose recommendations Bluebond was seeking for the Bench) which Bluebond deceptively calls “ethical and proper”. Laughable bias. Robyn Sokol, a local L.A. Attorney contacted Bluebond during litigation and asked her be her guest on a big “Panel”. Judge Bluebond accepted (with a ‘nod’ and a ‘wink’). In March 2022, they spent hours and hours together. Did anyone disclose this to Mr. Slotkin? Of course not!!
Unlike In re Slotkin, no “Motion to Disqualify” was filed in Thorpe v. Mandelbrot since it was Bluebond’s DUTY to RECUSE herself. Did she? Of course not! Solely so corrupt Judge Bluebond could create “bad law”, harm thousands of Asbestos victims, and esteemed professionals solely so she could maintain her cupcake job.
So now facing a Motion to Disqualify in In re Slotkin based on unquestionable facts of Judicial bias and bad faith (which requires her to recuse) – do you think she recused herself? Of course not! Slotkin is an elderly (82 year old man) who, like me, Bluebond has threatened with jail. She lied multiple times in the record (“I have
The exact same conduct as in the last ‘big’ case in her Courtroom – Thorpe v. Mandelbrot (Case No. 02-14216-BB – J.T. THORPE -Adversary Case No. 2:12-ap-02182-BB- Case No. 07-19271-BB -Adversary Case No. 2:12-ap-02183-BB Case No. 02:07-bk-20016-BB – Case No. 2:07-19721-BB). Here are some similar documents from my case, including the Judicial Complaint –
It’s Official: If you want to win cases before United States Bankruptcy Judge Sheri Bluebond (Central District, Los Angeles), be sure to let her know that you will “Recommending her for Reappointment.” If you are an “outsider” with no connections to Judge Sheri Bluebond, you don’t have a chance in her Courtroom. Zero chance.